I've Long Predicted Courts Will Ultimately Reject Tech's Fundamental Defense for Training LLMs Without Consent & Compensation. And Now, The First One Has.
With regards to your predicted content licensing frenzy (which I don’t disagree with) … it will be interesting to see if they even know what was included in the training sets. Broad licensing deals with Studios aren’t necessarily sufficient as the Studios may not even have all the right themselves, or they are shared with others based on specific content (e.g. Partner Studios, or worse, Filmmakers that don’t want it included). It will be interesting to watch as the genie can’t be put back into the bottle …
There is no question about that Michael. I wrote about this in one of my earlier articles. It is reasonable to assume there are NILV, privacy, biometric, and other issues that fall outside of contract that come into play. Here's a link to that one - https://themediabrain.substack.com/p/ces-ai-redux-highlights-from-the
With regards to your predicted content licensing frenzy (which I don’t disagree with) … it will be interesting to see if they even know what was included in the training sets. Broad licensing deals with Studios aren’t necessarily sufficient as the Studios may not even have all the right themselves, or they are shared with others based on specific content (e.g. Partner Studios, or worse, Filmmakers that don’t want it included). It will be interesting to watch as the genie can’t be put back into the bottle …
There is no question about that Michael. I wrote about this in one of my earlier articles. It is reasonable to assume there are NILV, privacy, biometric, and other issues that fall outside of contract that come into play. Here's a link to that one - https://themediabrain.substack.com/p/ces-ai-redux-highlights-from-the